Is this a gorgeous bird, or what?! My trip to The Heard last weekend was a treat, topped off by a pair of Red-headed Woodpeckers (Melanerpes erythrocephalus) who flew amongst the trees in the wetland area. You gotta love a red-head! I’ve seen a red-head one other time, at this same place, last year. I captured better images this time, and am excited to share them. When I looked in my antique bird guide, guess who I found on the cover?
I’ve got the “covergirl”! The male and female look alike, so I guess this could also be the male, checking out the accommodations for his mate. I absolutely love to to read the species accounts from this old guide – it offers insight into the status of the species 100 years ago, and generally offers a more personal viewpoint. Here is the red-head entry:
The artwork shows an adult in full red-headedness, and a young red-head before he gets his bright adult plumage. In case you cannot read the species account from the image, it says:
This very handsome species is common and very well known in the Middle and Central States. They are the ruffians of the family, very noisy and quarrelsome. One of their worst traits is the devouring of the eggs and young of other birds. To partially offset this, they also eat insects and grubs and a great deal of fruit.1
This once “common and very well known” bird of North America is now listed as Near Threatened by the IUCN2. The only place on the planet where red-heads live is North America:
Red-headed Woodpeckers make their nests in dead trees, and are not known to use nest boxes. This means that those old, dead-but-still-standing trees (snags), are vital to this bird’s survival. As for food, these birds are omnivorous, consuming insects, nuts, seeds, grubs, worms, berries, fruit – and yes, sometimes other young birds and eggs. 3 It stands to reason, that the biggest factor in their declining numbers is habitat loss, specifically – the snags.
This red-head is probably a male, since the males excavate the nest. I cannot make out exactly what he is removing – but it looks like a piece of wood or bark.
This is a “snag” – those old, dead trees that are so valuable to this species. Red-headed Woodpeckers aren’t the only species to nest in snags, so if you have a snag on your property, I hope you’ll leave it right where it is!
This species account is from another old bird guide, “The Yellow Book of Birds of America.”4 This is one of a select number of species to get a 2-page layout in this small book. This book makes the only reference to this bird as a “flag bird,” saying, “In some lights the black shows a bluish tint, and the bird is sometimes called the red-white-and-blue bird, or flag bird.” You will notice that both accounts from these old guides underscore how the red-head makes up for his more dastardly eating habits by also eating a great deal of pest-class insects and grubs.
The honor of the book-cover in one guide, and a two-page layout in the other suggest a real fondness for the Red-headed Woodpecker. It makes me sad to learn that their numbers have been declining. It further underscores the simple fact that as human populations increase, many other species decrease. It is my great hope that we recognize the effect that we have on the planet, and continue to find ways to live cleaner and less consumptive lives, so that the planet can support a healthy and robust biodiversity.
Speaking of red-heads, healthy, and robust…you gotta love this red-head too!5
- Bird Guide: Land Birds East of the Rockies, by Chester K. Reed, Copyright © 1909, Published by A.M. Eddy, Albion, NY ↩
- BirdLife International 2008. Melanerpes erythrocephalus. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.1. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 04 April 2010. ↩
- Birds of Texas, by Keith A. Arnold and Gregory Kennedy, Copyright ©2007, Published by Lone Pine Publishing International Inc. ↩
- The Yellow Book of Birds of America, by Frank G Ashbrook, Illustrations by Paul Moller, Copyright © 1931, Published by Whitman Publishing Company ↩
- shameless plug for one of my favorite shows, Mad Men, on AMC. ↩



















It’s really embarrassing that I’ve only been to the Heard twice, in spite of living in McKinney. I’ll have to make a better effort.
The Heard is well worth the visit, Joy. I recommend going in May – the colors really start to show and it has not yet become super-hot. I’ve been the The Heard many time, and still have not walked all of the trails. I have to admit, it is mostly because I love the areas I have visited so much that I can never bring myself to go off in different directions. Going to have to do that someday!
Wow, Amber, you are an artist with your computer! Your Photoshopping of Christina Hendricks’ head to my body is flawless. Excellent post!
Very funny, AJ.
Amber, I love reading the descriptions from those old guides. They are so much more descriptive than the current guides that use more photographs. The “ruffians” indeed!
You’ve managed to get some exceptional photos of the Red-headed Woodpeckers, you can see the blue iridescence well on the first and last images especially.
It sounds like they have the same problem the Eastern Bluebird once had with loss of habitat due to tree cutting and no more wooden fence posts or telegraph poles. Lucky the bluebird uses nest boxes. I wonder if, as the population declines, the Red-headed Woodpecker will learn to use them too?
I hope with you that we, as humans, can change our destructive and consumptive ways before it’s too late.
As to the old guide books descriptions, I wonder what they say about the Burrowing Owl? A reference I have from 1870 says they are “probably one of the most common birds in California,” now they are a Species of Special Concern.
Larry, “ruffians” is exactly the word that made this entry so awesome. I love such colorful (in a good way) language.
Just this evening, I was watching the Birds episode of Discovery Channel’s “Life” series, and it showed a startling and recent adaptation made by Great White Pelicans. The pelicans have reacted to the lack of fish available to them from over-fished seas, to preying on unguarded Gannet nestlings. If the pelicans can make this change to their eating habits, I hope that the Red-headed Woodpeckers can take advantage of nest boxes. I wonder, how does a species of bird make that first attempt to nest in a man-made structure?
As for Burrowing Owls in old bird guides – I’ll see if I can find an entry! If I do, I’ll email it to you.
I grew up in central Illinois where these woodpeckers are a fairly common sight. They are becoming scarce there and its nice to know that they are still out there and still lovely.
I sure hope they can hold their numbers – they are indeed lovely. Makes me want to erect a snag just for them.
It almost looks like somebody photoshopped that brilliant head onto the bird is it not?! Fabulous. Its wonderful to come across these natural beauties! Thanks for sharing!
That bright red head sure does look like it could be painted – or paintshopped – right on there. They are certainly a treat to spot – wish I could see them more often!
Amber, what a great post on a striking bird. Super photos, too. I can’t believe I never went to the Heard when I lived in Dallas – my loss. Maybe when I come back to see friends, I’ll be able to squeeze in a visit. Thanks for the terrific info.
I lived near the Heard for years before I visited for the first time. Now, I’m hooked, and simply must go at least once every month or two. I’m afraid that the North Texas Municipal Water District is about to bulldoze right through part of 2 prairies and through part of the wetland area to bury a 48″ sewage pipe. I am beside myself, as are many others. I will be writing about this very soon.
The Heard’s wetland area is the only place I have ever seen the gorgeous Red-headed Woodpecker!
These are one of my favorite birds. They look like they are all decked out for any occasion. Beautiful picture. Thank you for sharing.
Hi Sharon – easy to see why this bird is one of your favorites – they sure are fancy-lookin’!
Definitely one of the coolest North American Woodpeckers.
Hi Gunnar!
Agreed – they are way cool. And I feel lucky to live in their range so that I can take a short drive to see them.
I guess you have a few cool birds there in Peru. ;-D